Letter from Tiredwolf / SMOKING BAN

" Dear Benevolent one:

Does you know why the powers that
be, want people worldwide to stop smoking?
It is obviously bad for your health and pocket.
But why do these people who are otherwise busy
poisioning the cattle with vaccines etc.,seem
soo insistant on this one subject????
It does not fit the pattern/plan. I am soo
curious about this, that I really need to figure it out!
A more modern version of what you have been
discussing, was when Castro in Cuba emptied
the jails and sent them all to Florida as
refugee's seeking freedom in the US. It was a
novel and brillant plan by him. They were accepted with open arms by the authorities! --- Tiredwolf"


A couple of reasons here:

First smoking, like any recreational drug causes people to socialize and bond, their inhibitions relax a bit and people seem to see eye to eye when they are SHARING a nice experience (smoking). This cannot be allowed to happen. The smoking ban can be related to the NEMESIS "me/i/you conspiracy" film. It's a way of breaking up connections/bonds/friendships.

A recent bar around my way just 'banned' smoking. Instead of people lighting up and socializing, they are forced to go out the front or back door int he freezing cold and suck their cigarette in silence. Even if they huddle together with other smokers any bonding is negated by the guilt and resentment of having to go outside of the herd to smoke. Imagine if you were at a bar and everytime you wanted to do a shot (not a beer, but a SHOT) you had to go outside to do it because there was a ban on shooting alcohol - it would CERTAINLY take away from the bonding ritual of people doing shots - you would instead feel guilt and resentment, most likely placed on those in the bar not doing shots whom you would assume supported the legislation...

#2: SHOCK-TEST....

Who remembers one of the first smoking ban in NYC... I remember thinking, are the sheeple really going to stand for this?? I mean it's a BAR - they are drinking ALCOHOL inside which kills you FASTER than second hand smoke. Fact: 1 beet VS all night in a smoke filled bar - the beer is more unhealthy. The argument was that bars were 'public places' and SECOND HAND smoke was a health factor - true, it is MARGINALLY - but what's more important to consider is people enter a bar knowing this. It's like if your ass sits at the dolphin show you know your ass is gonna get wet! Should there be a BAN on front row seating at the dolphin fun-show?

So of course the point is not health but rather more restrictions on the sheep. Again, the more they borrow (prove that they are wild animals) the more they shall be boxed inside cages (where wild animals belong). It all comes down to a loss of FREDOM. And arbeit macht frei --- WORK brings freedom. A nation of workers gets to smoke - a nation of begging savages does not. The elite put the dollar in the touchtunes so they get to play Madonna all night if they so choose. At the end of the day the fact remains - the cattle lost their privileged to smoke.

Why did the elite pick smoking? As I stated first, we cant have people bonding. As I stated second they lost their right to vote when they traded the shovel for the credit card. You cannot have a pack of wild, borrowing, savages "organizing" or bonding. Just imagine these insane BUBBLEHEADS and BUBBLETARDS who are loosing "their" borrowed McMansions and "luxury" condos. You simply cannot have INSANE people getting together and organizing.

I can see it now, a bunch of gooks sitting in a bar over cigarettes yammering on about "yeah, they bail out the big banks - but where's OUR bailout!?" , "he yeah, we should DO something" , "yeah lets DO something about out greedy government", "yeah, hey pass me a cigarette.."

This is why there are so man iSheep products! You simply cannot have PSYCHOPATHIC BEGGARS "getting any ideas".

As you know, the first person to bad smoking in modern times was a man I admirer, Der Fuer.

Here we have a no smoking in your car PSA from Der Fuer:




Der Fuer visited my city in 1937. I have heard stories from the old folks about how they saw the big blimp with the colorful swastikas on its tail fins float gracefully over the skyline. I wish I could have been there was there (Hitler aboard the Zepplin Hindenburg floating over my neighborhood in 1937)



"Tiredwolf- good question...

On tobacco (I assume that is what you meant by smoking, as the other kind is still illegal for the most part in USA) - There is another angle about smoking (tobacco) that is pushed on the people- they know already that higher taxes will not curb the smoking habit but make the people simply pay more (I have heard arguments that nicotine is more addictive than heroin). However, what I believe the main push for making tobacco look so awful is that the government always does actions like this to "look good" to the people. It is always beneficial to put fear into people in small and large ways (such as the "threat" of second hand smoking), create another class of people through this push (smokers and non-smokers) that are "separate" from each other, and above all else- fight the "evil" with one hand (laws, education against tobacco, look good) and wholeheartedly support it with the other (by allowing the supply of cigarettes into any and all stores). If you want other examples of this, think of the US drug war (fight drugs with one hand, bring it into US via CIA with the other), or the war on terror (fight against the taliban while supplying them with training, arms, equipment) -- Leonard"

very true! Smoking bans reinforce that "government is good" ... "why would they kill us, they care about our health" --- in fact why would they never HARM us, they banned smoking - they would NEVER harm us!