2009 WORLD ECONOMIC COLLAPSE!

"THE SHIT HAS HIT THE FAN!"

NOW PLAYING ------------ FIXED "LUCIFER PROJECT - BANNED RAP SONG FROM 1998"
This is the ORIGINAL version - banned from youtube.

Note, the synchronization is off -- deal with it.

FIXED: ORIGINAL VERSION OF POWER TO THE SHEEPLE - youtube censored the music.....

NOW PLAYING ------ FIXED: "THE MOON-WATCHER"

This is the ORIGINAL version of the Moon-Watcher which was previously REMOVED by youtube - this version contains the ORIGINAL MUSIC.


NOW PLAYING - - - The Latest NEMESIS film: "DAN"

"Watching this video was like being forced to take a dump into the mouth of a loved one, while eating out a crab infested crack whore who just gave birth, all the while having hot coffee slow dripped onto my testicles." --- Turk


NOW PLAYING: The Latest NEMESIS video: "SMALL FARM"

"The power of human population is so superior to the power of the earth to produce subsistence for man, that premature death must in some shape or other visit the human race. The vices of mankind are active and able ministers of depopulation. They are the precursors in the great army of destruction, and often finish the dreadful work themselves. But should they fail in this war of extermination, sickly seasons, epidemics, pestilence, and plague advance in terrific array, and sweep off their thousands and tens of thousands. Should success be still incomplete, gigantic inevitable famine stalks in the rear, and with one mighty blow levels the population with the food of the world." --- Malthus



THE HONORABLE REGGIE RAWLS CONGRESSIONAL NEMESIS VIDEO ARCHIVE BOOKS 1 & 2

Quotes

"Degrees are, after all, easy to come by - you have only to memorize" --- Esther Vilar

"Why are people so dumb?? i will never again in my life get a credit card or take out any type of loan!!! i havent for over 3 years and i never will!!! hives is correct, you cannont get ahead by borrowing,,,you just wind up in debt all your life,,so all the money you make,,goes to your debt,,which means you cant spend your money on simple things that you want or need,, and the funniest part about this whole scam is the fact that your average moran (which is almost everybody) will go get into more debt as soon as they pay one debt off!!!! FUCKING RETARDS, short bus riding too many chromozone having mongoids!!!

hears a suggestion,,pay off all your debt,,and never EVER again borrow money,,,if you dont have the money to buy what you want ,,then save it up,,its as easy as 123, ABC, its really that simple,,,,oh but NOOOOO,,i got to have that new chrysler 300 with 3000 dollar rims and tinted windows and a 2000 dollar stereo system,,,so i can be in debt for the next 5 years and probly go to jail numerous times cause i look like a mark.

guess what dipshits,,,if the bank refuses to loan you money for whatever reason,,take it as a blessing in disguise,,now go take your money and safe it like any normal responsable person would do,,then buy your wants,,that way your not in fucking debt,,,,OMG its so easy it actually makes sense" -- titsnass

"Help YOURSELF or KILL yourself" --Hidden-Hand

"Alex Jones is like the best friend that the bitch runs to after her pimp fucked her, and complains about how terrible he treats her. The best friend will never do anything about it and the bitch will never quit the pimp she is addicted too." -- TheGreySpirit

"Behold the disenfranchised white male with no real power. now he knows how it feels to be black, so his only options are to find himself a preacher and sing slave songs about 401Ks, foreclosures, cubicles and baldness" -- SlalomHO

"People flock to leaders because they take no responsibility for their own protection.

In the case of the Occultation:

The ancients asked why, instead of asking how!

Why: implies knowledge coming from authority.

How: implies knowledge coming from experience.

If they looked up and asked how like the Watchers, they would know. Instead they asked why like the Joneses, and followed the ones who knew how.

Alex Jones will never tell you HOW 911 really happened, just WHY. The reason is when you look for HOW, why becomes less important.

Sheeple ask why, why is always answered with "because of ______ that is HOW it works."

Therefore by this method of inquiry, you will never know the cause, only the desired effect.

Example #1:

Say you were a tribal islander and suddenly your friends head exploded because an invader pointed a gun at him and shot him.

You only have seconds to react.

You could chose EMOTION and you could ask WHY did the sun god come from the water and strike my friend with fire from his hand?

This causes you to try to reason with the invader as if he is your god. He then takes you on a slave ship to be worked to death like the horse he shot last week.

AS LOGIC WILL CLEARLY TELL YOU IN MOST CASES YOU WILL BE SHOT.

OR, You could try chosing LOGIC and you could ask HOW, causing you to wrestle the gun away from the invader thus saving your life.

Example #2:

You are in Debt in America.

You only have months to react before the creditors foreclose.

You could ask WHY am I in this mess, leading you to Watch the Moneymasters and Zietgiest and become a protester ranting about the current economic crisis. Later you are targeted as a dissenter and also hauled into jail with all freedoms being removed from you.

You could chose EMOTION and you could ask WHY, causing you to try to reason with the government.

AS LOGIC WILL CLEARLY TELL YOU IN MOST CASES YOU WILL BE SHOT.

Or you could choose LOGIC and ask, HOW did I get this way? This would lead you to realize that if everyone borrows then the government needs more IOU's. More IOU's means more money is printed thus reducing its value. As logic will clearly tell you, if you are in debt you are worth less than ZERO because your net worth is negative, and must repay the debt at all costs. You then take responsibility and clear the debt.

Example #3:

The earth is losing the ability to support life due to a rapidly growing population that relies on convienience and technology at the cost of resources and environmental stability with a heavy dependence on foreign oil.

You only have a few years to react.

You could choose the EMOTIONAL question and ask WHY, can't the earth support more life? This leads you to green technology, clean coal, and the organic movement. You create technology and advertizements to save the earth similar to the ones you used to try to save your dead mother from breast cancer.

Now every one wears a green ribbon and pledges to recycle and reuse, but nobody stops fucking. Pretty soon the planet has even more people than recycling will help.

Recycling and Reusing is about as effective as rinsing a plate. When the food is gone, the plate no longer matters. The people no longer can eat because there is not enough food. The people begin to compete for resources in the final WORLD WAR. Nukes are launched on land that no longer supports life anyways. Everyone dies.

AS LOGIC WILL CLEARLY TELL YOU IN MOST CASES YOU WILL BE SHOT.

OR, you could chose LOGIC and deal with the CAUSE of the problem, in this case the people themselves.

You put poisons in the food, air and water so that people die and only the strong survive by natural selection. You use mind control like 911 to put people to war right away, when the stakes are lower so that the battles never escalate beyond reasonable means. You also use the tragedy to jumpstart the LIFEKILL statistics. You fight in the desert, tundra, and jungle because you want to keep the farmland valuable. You also use this war so that the heads of state profit from the resources aquired ensuring the survival of the elite over the masses because the elite are your friends and the masses are not.

By picking LOGIC you dominate. By picking EMOTION you are subject to the rule of others.

Example #1

Logic = Survival

You survived because you isolated the cause and killed the invader. You took responsibility for your own life.

Emotion = Death

You were ruled by FEAR and saw the man (the invader) as being your superior. You gave the man ownership of your life by refusing to act to save it.

Example #2

Logic = Survival

You survived because you isolated the cause and eliminated the debt. You took responsibility for your own life.

Emotion = Death

You were ruled by FEAR and saw the man (the party owed) as being your superior. You gave the man ownership of your life by refusing to act to save it.

Example #3

Logic = Survival

You survived because you isolated the cause and killed the sheeple. You took responsibility for your own life.

Emotion = Death

You were ruled by FEAR and saw man (the sheeple) as being your superior. You gave man ownership of your life by refusing to act to save it.

Example #4:

The Occultation:

Through fear man gave responsibility for the course of their lives over to city-states of organized religious and concentrated political power instead of choosing to live in small self-reliant communities observing and coexisting in harmony with the science of nature."

-- ZEROMESSIAH

"If man believes in Sun-eating snakes, virgin mothers, elephant headed Gods with 6 arms, 'miracles', and other loony bullshit. Is he NOT detriment to humanity and completly delusional? If you believe in fairy tales, how could you EVER be fit to deal with REAL 'Earthly' problems? And since a person like this CHOOSES to be delusional by believing in religion instead of FACING REALITY. Does he not diserve SLAVERY and confienment to protect the rest of humanity from his nonsensities?" --- smithxcx

THE PLANET IS JUST A FUCKING COMPUTER. I know the reason why the process works. The human brain is simply an electrical system. Replace neurons with transistors and you have the working model for a neural network.

I worked with computers alot when I was working at a call center, so I understand how it relates to the brain.

The practice of manipulation by psychology is really more like computer programming. Psychology really amounts to source-code for human brains and operating strings of data written to them.

MK-Ultra found that under the influence of certain chemicals, neuro-transmitters could be interrupted and the human brain could be hacked with data thrown directly into the subconscious.

Effectively this hacks the brain by removing the Ego and leaves just the hardware. This is the computer equivalent of rebooting windows and re-writing another operating system to the drive directly. They then Install a personality, which is just like installing another operating system to a dual-boot configuration.

However, open ended programs exist in the media. Tv commercials and the news are really just trojans and worms. They leave strings of data that self organize into programs via packets of data like "cool people smoke.", "Credit is free money", "I can make money flipping houses" and "Tight pants and sunglasses are cool." The output turns into Hipsters and the housing boom.

They already have had this since Bernays and understood it fully after World War 2. IBM was largely involved in computing and the concentration camps were really the largest group study ever performed on captive human beings.

Replace the phrase 'concentration camps' with 'experimental group' and you will realize the power and scope of the research actually taking place on all sides of the wars since.

If you think of the entire planet as a computer this becomes all the more apparent. Every time we make a technological leap forward in computing we must test our findings against the human mind to adjust the throughput of our societal matrix. The population was increasing at one time to increase the power of the Democracy program, I.E. Mob Rule requires mobs. However this paradigm has reached the limits of thermodynamics or the carrying capacity of the planet. We also do not have a heat sink to combat global warming.

Therefore we must track all of the packets of data effectively and remove the malfunctioning clusters or to scan and defragment the drive, which is the available resources.

Therefore to scan the data we will institute RFIDs to map the planets architecture and then institute LIFEKILL to wipe the clusters of anomalous data and clear space in valuable sectors.

It's not computer science, just common sense.

When you know HOW -- "why" becomes less important." -- The Honorabe ZERO

"If you take a bale of hay and tie it to the tail of a mule and then strike a match and set the bale of hay on fire, and if you then compare the energy expended shortly thereafter by the mule with the energy expended by yourself in the striking of the match, you will understand the concept of amplification." -- William Shockley (Inventor of the transistor)

"THIS IS THE BEST VIRTUAL"REAL" ESTATE ON THE INTERNET.

I SPEND 20 YEARS LEARNING BULLSHIT

I SPENT 2 MONTHS HERE AND MY LIFE

IS IN ORDER LIKE A GERMAN PANZER DIVISION

THANX " -- GunterKoss


Rich dad poor dad -- CLICK LINK
SPECIAL E-BOOK "rich dad, poor dad"

If you like NEMESIS videos, you'll LOVE the e-book rich dad, poor dad. If you liked "The manipulated man" then you'll like this too.

NO BULLSHIT.

HARSH, HARD, BLUNT truths!!!

Since I know you morans don't trust me, I've listed some of the chapters to entice you:

Chapter 2: The Rich Don’t Work for Money

Chapter 6: The Rich Invent Money

Chapter 7: Work to Learn, Don’t Work for Money

READ THE BOOK. You will love it. The author explains how his 'rich dad' viewed his employees as CATTLE who mistakenly believed they were ENTITLED to things they did not EARN. He used this delusion in the sheep to EXPLOIT them for their slave labor.

He bluntly explains that the rich DO NOT WORK - others work for them. He goes into detail about how going to school and getting a 'good job' is just SLAVERY and the rich DO NOT DO IT THIS WAY.

Classic book, some of you may heave read it already.

An especially good book for you young ones out there always asking me "what type of job/field should I get into so I wont end up a sheep"

READ DA BOOK!
http://www.megaupload.com/?d=DP9WMUVY
NOTE!!! There is PROBLEM with this book. The second half of the book is complete BULLSHIT - the author begins to advocate BORROWING and using loans. Ignore this second part. I would hope most of you would have the brains [moran] to figure that out, but still.


BEANIE-CAP for BEANIE-BRAINS

No, this is NOT fake. There is now for sale an 'infowars', club-infowarrior cadet, vice-scout, level 3, arch-cleric, wool knit BEANIE CAP!! Wear your beanie caps infowariors! Fight the good fight against that government boogie man that made you take out your 300k mortgage and your $120k in student loans. MORANS! Jones is officially a genius for getting these MORANS to buy a benie-cap! Beanie caps for beanie-brains! ... LOL!

Sunday, March 8, 2009

What is LOVE?

"If the honorable DJ is compassionate and deep; why is he single and fucking? I wonder what happened to the DJ at 25...he refers to that age alot...something to do with women.

Speaking for myself, I think he is right. I don't see myself as compassionate and deep with men. When I get an attraction to a guy, a light turns on, and I start to want to have passionate, mind blowing sex with him. That's the way to express the love connection in my mind.

I really don't know how to care and nurture for the emotions of men. I mean, I can consider their feelings about issues...that I can do with anybody...and try to be sensitive. But a deep emotional connection? How do you even do that?

I relate to people intellectually (men and women). So I guess an intellectual connection plus a consideration of feelings is possible on my part. Maybe I don't know what love is; I've never fallen in love. How would I know? The DJ seems to have more knowledge about this subject than I do. An enlightenment from him would be appreciated. -- Lady Anonymous"

Love is mostly fantasy and a dangerous disorder. The opposite of love is hate. You have to hate deeply to experience true love which is simply when you manage to get EXACTLY what you want. If a guy meets a girl thats attractive, nice, likes him back, is fun etc.. if that's what he WANTS and she fits that definition he will be in love.

If a woman wants to find a man thats good looking, rich and exciting - if that's what she wants and he fits that definition she will be in love.

If a person longs to live in a certain type of area and finds it in say a new city, he or she will be in love with that city. It works the same way for material things... as in "I love my car!"

The 'problem' with love is A) it requires one to be extremely honest with themselves and B) If you love when you love, then you will HATE when you hate.

You cant have true love, with anything or anyone unless you place it against your deepest HATE, which are typically the opposites of your wants. For instance, if you truly LOVE hot weather then you will truly HATE cold weather... if you claim to 'love' both you are not being HONEST with yourself. You may "LIKE" both, but you cannot in all honesty say you LOVE both when they are indeed opposites. Most people cannot love because they cannot hate. By being dishonest with themselves they create a lifeless middle-ground where neither emotion is felt. They stay in the "SAFETY" of just 'liking' things, this way, when they are removed from them they wont have to deal with the consequential hurt that goes along with losing something you were in love with.

This is where the statement "It's better to have loved and lost, than to not have loved at all" explains.

Still most people never take the "RISK" of loving for fear of having to face being honest with themselves about what they TRULY want. For instance I HATE most new music today - I HATE it. But I truly LOVE (and loved) the old music from 7 years ago and back. Most people will deal with this by pretending to "LIKE" modern music and by doing this they'll never know what it feels like to be in love with a certain song or genre or style of music.

People don't love today because they also don't want to deal with HATING. Hate requires that you change yourself, which as you know people don't want to do - they want someone else to do it for them. For instance, I once hated where I lived with a passion! (I'm talking about the town that I lived in) I remember how all the townsfolk would pretend like they didn't hate it too -- but of course they did too. Anyway my hating eventually led me to move to a city which i loved - but what you morans need to realize is that I had to HATE first. Sure I could have pretended to "like" living in that town, but then I would never be able to find a place i loved.

You know you are in love when you are content - meaning you get the feeling that not ONE THING in life could be better or should change to differ from where you are presently at. It's when you don't want to change a thing (except say to make it even better).

The last time I was in love was 1997.

That's why I hate you all.

....


All love is CONDITIONAL. There is no such thing as unconditional love. People fall out of love, or lose love for another person because they failed to live up to, or maintain, the CONDITION of the love.

A woman will love her man so long as he pays the bills and takes care of her.. this is true love for her - but the moment he loses his job or looks like he will become delinquent you will be shocked at how FAST she falls OUT of love with him.

Likewise if the man suddenly hits the lottery or signs a Multi-million dollar record deal, you'd be shocked to see how many women will INSTANTLY fall in LOVE with him. You see fools, love is NOT a GRADUAL thing like the sheep believe - it is an instantaneous fulfillment of all wants between two individuals, or an individual in a person, place or thing.

This is why women LOVE TV men, and movie star men, and rappers, and basket ball player men. Have you ever noticed how women just LOVE famous actors.. they think they are 'so hot' or 'so sexy' etc. This is because - to them - they are attracted to MONEY. It is their instant attractor. Just like men are instantly attracted to tits and fat asses, women are attracted to instantly seeing a rich guy (the actor/star) appear in front of them on TV. Watching a regular TV show or Film is like pornography to women. They instantly fall in love with holographic images of men they know are rich. Now pay attention: MEN on the other hand do not look at TV and go "shes so hot" or "shes so sexy" .. to men the everyday woman he sees walking down the street or at the grocery store are much more attractive to him that some anemic image on TV. The reason why you don't hear men gossiping about actresses the way women carry on for hours about george clooney or brad pit is because men are not concerned with MONEY. They are concerned with looks and everyone knows there's more curves and tits out in public than on NBC. But that's NOT the case for women. A woman is 99% more likely to see a rich man on TV than she will walking past the thousands of 'average joes' (financially) she sees everyday on the street.

Again the point to remember is love is CONDITIONAL. I used BASIC examples of love between men and women in that last example but you can apply it to any noun.

A mother on loves her kids because they keep her secure with her husband. Women have children to keep their man. A mother will love her child ONLY if the CONDITION is met that the child remains her defacto benefactor. If the child's father is shot dead, and the father left no inheritance or had any insurance, and the state refused to give the mother welfare because she actually had a modest full time job, the mothers love for that child would INSTANTLY VANISH. Both rappers Biggie Smalls and Emenem talked about this in their famous rap songs. Many other songs too. But if a child can't get a mother welfare (security) then what use is he? Why should she love him? Indeed she CAN'T love him! And she WONT love him.

Let's say a man loves his wife.. who is a hot little shorty. Now say she gets hit by a bus one day and gets paralyzed from the waist down and ends up gaining 90 pounds. I will bet you a one Kentucky Fried Chicken original recipe tender crisp with a side of coleslaw and a biscuit he will fall OUT OF love with her in an FLAMING INSTANT.

To summarize, love is only realized through HATE, and when you do find it - it's all conditional and the moment that it does not meet ALL of your desires you will cease to love it.


Many people have trouble accepting that UNCONDITIONAL LOVE DOES NOT EXIST. After all they falsely believe that their MOTHER gave them unconditional love... Nothing could be further from the truth!! So when both male and female get older they seek out this mystical unconditional love that never was to begin with. A man will try and try and try to find a woman that DOESN'T want him for his loot-sacks. He will try to find a woman like his mother who will "love him for who he is". No my children, your mother only loved you under a financial security condition and your future wife will only love you under a financial security condition.

It's like dat.

And dats the way it is.

A woman will also look for someone to love her unconditionally 'for who she is'. Let her be fat, ugly, or not as attractive as the competition and she will quickly learn that there is no such thing. Only is she is a cutie pie will she have a chance at stealing a hot sack. And just like her father only loved her because she met the CONDITION that he would get STEADY HOT PUSSY ON THE REGULAR from her mother - a future husband will only love her under the condition of him getting STEADY HOT PUSSY ON THE REGULAR.

The same things can be said for the LOVE of material objects or things. You will only LOVE your new car under the CONDITIONS you have set for it. If the car constantly breaks down or becomes old in your eyes it will cease to meet the conditions of your love. You see you don't actually love the car unconditionally! You only love it conditionally. That's love - CONDITIONAL.

I'm gonna pop you off on a little secret:

From now on I want you all to forever think of the word "LOVE" as really being the word "CONDITIONAL-LOVE"... And think right now, and in your daily travels WHAT particular conditions were set on YOU, or what conditions have you set on other people, places or things that make you 'love' them or them 'love you'.

Once you do this you will be able to exploit the sheeple. You see humans UNCONSCIOUSLY know that there love is CONDITIONAL - as a result they are in a constant race to make sure that these conditions are ALWAYS MET.

Take a husband for example. He unconsciously KNOWS that his wife will only 'love' him (give him stead pussy on command) if he provides her with money and material things (that's 'love' in her minds). So the male sheep can BEST be exploited by this cold harsh fact! If you are selling something to a man it must always be focused on his 'winning over' (or buying things for) his wife or potential wife. A man can't just say "I love you" to his wife. He's gotta say it with a diamond ring, or a new car, or home improvements (for her castle), or fancy dinners, shows, events, shopping. That's how men say "I love you". And the whole point of a man saying "I love you" to a woman is so she can reciprocate by saying "I love you too" (women of course say I love you by offering their vagina on command). This weakness can be exploited during any day to day transaction with men: if you don't buy this you wont get pussy, if you don't buy this the pussy will be cut off. In a sense every male ends up being TURK because everything he buys is aimed at maintaining a steady flow of flint. The more CRAP the pussy-worshipper can throw at the feet of the goddess, the more love he can receive. And since he can't CONSCIOUSLY admit that his love must be proven CONDITIONALLY his unconscious mind - which is in charge of impulse, suggestion, and irrational behavior - is left wide open for an assault by a clever salesman (YOU!).

The male addiction to love is exploited in TV and movies all the time. The male lead is in a struggle to get love (ie PUSSY). If he does certain things, he gets pussy - if he does other things he does NOT get pussy. The impressionable subconscious of the pussy whipped and unconditional love addicted male viewer leaves the cinema with a completely new IDEA transplanted into his head on how to get pussy.
Sex sells. No matter how inconspicuous the item is you are selling, if you are selling to a male always elude, either overtly or covertly, that he will get pussy (in the case of the single man) or continue to KEEP his steady pussy by buying the product. I personally often use this line "your wife will love it" or "she'll like that one!" or "this'll make her happy." If the male is single he is not in a position to just GIVE love (ie - just walk up to a woman and give her $2000 to win her) he must first GET love. In other words he must SHOW that he is ABLE to give "LOVE" to a women (MONEY!!) I use lines like "this will make you lot's of money" , "it's a profitable investment", "you have more money in your pocket", "you'll have EXTRA money now" This money will be of course used to show a woman he is able to love her.

You all are more than familiar with the famous Debeers diamond commercials which say overt things like "SHOW HER YOU LOVE HER with a new diamond ANNIVERSARY pendant"

(again love (buying her things) must always be maintained in order to keep the giver from having to consciously deal with knowing he is loving CONDITIONALLY! Which to him would be like finding out Santa Claus is not real.)

But the SAME effectiveness is had with the more subtle "Save EXTRA MONEY" - constantly offering the male "extra money", "savings", allows him to get and maintain his favorite prostitute... his wife.

Add to this the equally effective technique of "buying things for her" approval - and he'll open up his wallet fast. You can even combine the two! An example would be offering new FABULOUS wall to wall carpet for HER house at "30% EXTRA OFF" makes him really happy because he gets to buy the carpet to impress here AND get extra money to impress his wife with later. Add in a few sneaky cues like "yep you could use this money to go on a vacation with your wife soon" (say it "jokingly" snicker..) and he will jump at the chance to impress his favorite governor of the feminist code. Always interject the idea of impressing pussy (showing love) which, lucky for you, is a ENDLESS task in the minds of those who will not CONSCIOUSLY accept that love is indeed CONDITIONAL. I must say it again: the mere thought of love being conditional is enough to scare the person into a lifetime of pussy pleasing servitude in order to avoid the TRUTH of conditional love!

AWAY MAKE MEN THINK THAT THEY NEVER HAVE ENOUGH (need more this, and more that, and better this) TO PROVE THEIR LOVE TO A WOMAN.

Now WOMEN can be exploited simply by making them think they are too fat or ugly. A woman shows her love by offering vagina on command. But if she FEELS she is unattractive she will feel that she cannot meet the CONDITIONS of loving a man. Since women are the stupider of the sexes these techniques have been much more overt in advertising media and Hollywood (remember the female addiction to unconditional love can also be exploited in movies - and it is!). How did the female lead in the movie get the rich man? By being unattainably "beautiful". How did she get to be unattainably beautiful? [insert cognitive mind conditioning magnetic bio-mine here]. But since woman is both useless AND stupid her mind is simply induced to attain the unattainable beauty of the female lead in the films buy buying the PRODUCTS which feature similar looking models on it (in some cases its the SAME ACTRESS that was in the film to begin with! -- this is why FEMALE CELEBRITIES offer the best endorsement of products - ESPECIALLY ACTRESSES ... in fact this power is so great that top actresses that are CURRENTLY big in hollywood are never seen in TV commercials).

But many times a new IDEA is inserted into the heads of the goy woman movie watcher - like say for example you'll have the female lead get the rich husband because she divorced her last husband (the state runs the idea of divorce and thus by plugging divorce as an attractive option to getting rich, the state gains huge power from the women who flock to the courts to mimicked what the movies conditioned her to do).

I was watching the film Bringing Down the House the other day - the plot is exactly like this. The woman divorces her husband (who is rich) because he works too much. She takes the kids and gets a new house and a new younger husband. In the end she ends up 'realizing' she still loves him and gets back with him in the end... Happy ending right?

The viewer however will see this: Woman gets rich husband by divorcing husband, taking kids and splitting up family.

All that the female viewer sees is DIVORCE AND BREAKING UP THE FAMILY MEANS LOVE!

DIVORCE AND BREAKING UP THE FAMILY MEANS LOVE!

DIVORCE AND BREAKING UP THE FAMILY MEANS LOVE!

DIVORCE AND BREAKING UP THE FAMILY MEANS LOVE!

The are not intelligent enough to see the paradox in 2 people falling out of love for certain reasons, but then falling BACK in love FOR THOSE VERY SAME REASONS!!!

Get a brain morans [go usa]!!! Get a brain! She gets the RICH MAN in the end. But she HAD the rich man to begin with! A woman doesn't give up her rich husband, like a husband doesn't give up his hot wife - both are meeting the conditions of their love.

No - all the viewer sees is that DIVORCE and breaking up the family LEADS TO HAPPINESS!! I'm sure that if during the entire time the lead female is drinking diet coke the viewer will also associate the two as well...

but i digress... LOVE is NOT A WORD. The only word that exists is "CONDITIONAL LOVE". The OPPOSITE of "CONDITIONAL LOVE" is not "UN-CONDITIONAL LOVE" but rather....."HATE"

Think about that morans...

-- hives

No comments:

Post a Comment